A0K:
I?m Lexie @ #Ketchum Digital. I ? science, smart doctors, & helping people be social, learn more, & feel better. #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
#socpharm starting? I’m Michael Spitz, Digital Strategist with Ignite Health, a full service healthcare communications company.
A0K:
@SpitzStrategy yep #socpharm has begun. Thanks for joining!
A0K:
@richmeyer hope you’ll join us over at #socpharm! no zombies allowed.
richmeyer:
Sorry making my wife a gourmet dinner #socpharm
richmeyer:
In meeting with a lot of physicians they are scared to death of social media in general #socpharm
richmeyer:
Also heard in last research “I’m tired of spending so much time on the Internet” #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Docs also like to address specific, detailed, clinically relevant and documented topics — free flowing open chat is new to them #socpharm
richmeyer:
The key is to develop a SM tool to help them get the info they need and cut thru clutter #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Scheduling is also an issue for real time social media doc chat — SERMO discussions can be left and revisited #socpharm
jackbilson3:
I Agree! @SpitzStrategy Docs also like to address specific, detailed, clinically relevant & documented topics #socpharm
richmeyer:
@ABoyle129 No med school students were not in our research but we did interview younger docs +they are getting weary of Web time #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The Twitter interface is also poor for chatting; who wants to keep adding hashtags to open strings?
#socpharm
richmeyer:
Basically went from too little info to too much..I love what Sanofi did with their HCP site #socpharm
A0K:
@richmeyer i heard that too recently RT @richmeyer heard in last research “I’m tired of spending so much time on the #Internet” #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Docs would spend more time on the Internet if the Internet would be more receptive to targeted user needs #socpharm
richmeyer:
@a0k As one doc said to us it’s like trying to find relevant articles when there are 10,000 #Internet#socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Docs also need quick and intuitive access to clinical data — Twitter is awful as a multimedia sharing tool #socpharm
richmeyer:
Providing Medical Practice Management Tools and Resources | iPractice #socpharm” target=”_blank”>http://t.co/bPzFXrk#socpharm I think an excellent site
SpitzStrategy:
@philbaumann We’re on your side! All of us would love for it to take off — suggestions on how? #socpharm
A0K:
@jackbilson3 true, but my latest @Sermo use isn’t getting the numbers I’m used to from 07,08, 09. It’s hard to know what they want #socpharm
A0K:
Signal-to-noise ratio is a challenge online in general, but even more so if you’re looking for urgent health info #socpharm @richmeyer
richmeyer:
@A0K @jackbilson3 @Sermo I think they lost when they decided to get in bed with pharma #socpharm
richmeyer:
@a0k Not to mention credibility #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@richmeyer Monetization is a tantalizing temptation — why Facebook resisted for so long — you’re right about SERMO #socpharm
jackbilson3:
@a0k Well for one PCPs want to use the device on their belt or in their purse not the interwebs #socpharm
friedah03:
Hi all. Frieda Hernandez here from Siren Interactive, buz dev/strategy and joining late. #socpharm
richmeyer:
When we last did research docs said their level of trust with pharma info was still high except when it came to mass market drugs #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@philbaumann Understood — we’re just speculating about longer term viability, stickiness, popularity — and usefulness #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@richmeyer We did some market research, too — so long as pharma sticks to clinical data & doesn’t dress it up, docs are on board #socpharm
richmeyer:
@SpitzStrategy The more complicated the drug (i.e. cancer drugs) the more they are on board #socpharm
MD_Chat:
Twitter chats aren’t Sermo; they’re not Facebook; they’re not forums. They’re just easy-to-use serendipity parties. #Socpharm
philbaumann:
@SpitzStrategy Twitter chats in general will live a while. But they’ll also evolve. A lot depends on what Twitter does too. #socpharm
richmeyer:
Most docs are afraid of social media lots of legal challenges #socpharm
A0K:
T2: the FDA’s “ghost rules” of context (http://bit.ly/c7wXL7)> Are we responsible for content we don’t control (e.g. on Facebook?) #socpharm
richmeyer:
We tried to get docs to sign up for Twitter chat on new development of a drug and did not have success #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@richmeyer Agreed — less complicated drugs also tend to be more commoditized and less specialized, raising skepticism #socpharm
richmeyer:
But when we used a closed loop non-public chat we were able to get them onboard #socpharm
richmeyer:
@SpitzStrategy Like one doc told us “I dont need to see anymore info on Lipitor or Viagra #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The boundary between “branded” and “unbranded” content is tough enough without introducing form and content issues #socpharm
philbaumann:
@richmeyer I can’t see how a branded Twitter chat would work for docs. Twitter’s not the right medium for that particular use. #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
FDA needs to separate the pharma content from the associated content — and context — but it becomes difficult to define #socpharm
A0K:
@richmeyer could be re: #Sermo — but why isn’t there a way to create secure physician portals & share the wisdom to pharma safely #socpharm
TheRealDanSfera:
T2: Pharma shouldn’t be responsible for content they cant control, but can they encourage conversation to sway one way or another? #socpharm
MD_Chat:
Industries don’t have to try to fit every medium into their arsenal. Pharma Marketing on Twitter is probably an exercise in dopery #socpharm
friedah03:
Heard that from Uros years ago! RT @richmeyer: @SpitzStrategy Like one doc told us “I dont need to see anymore info on…Viagra #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Now if it’s your web page, you own (and are responsible for) that page & everything within & directly connected to that page #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
FDA is confused by digital boundaries, equating ownership and responsibility with every unique url #socpharm
TheRealDanSfera:
RT @SpitzStrategy: FDA needs to separate the pharma content from the associated content — and context — but it becomes difficult to define #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The Web does not work like a bulletin board, TV commercial, or pamphlet — the web is dynamic and interactive #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The Web also has limitations imposed on content — so fair balance becomes a nightmare if the FDA does not allow one-click linking #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Fair balance is archaic, too — Who actually reads the 2.5 point font fine print? Presenting it doesn’t mean it is understood #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Digital offers a whole new way to experience content — out-dated regulations preclude exploring exciting new possibilities #socpharm
A0K:
@SpitzStrategy YES! RT @spitzstrategy FDA is confused by #digital boundaries, equating ownership & responsblty w/ every unique url #socpharm
TheRealDanSfera:
@a0k true, but not talking about ads, more about social media type “conversation” #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Once new and better methods are discovered to share fair balance the scale will tip to better utilization of emerging technologies #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@TheRealDanStera “conversations” will happen when adverse event and reputation management are figured out #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@A0K When Gen-Y folks eventually run the government these opportunities will become self-evident; hard to teach folks new tricks! #socpharm
A0K:
@TheRealDanSfera true, but social conversation is very hard to influence — & angry anti-pharm activists often can’t be “swayed” #socpharm
jackbilson3:
FTC says terms and conditions can be confirmed with a check box for a home loan on the web; why not Fair Balance? #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Now government (& industry) leaders look at the “Like” feature w/ horror; in a few years it’ll be how we all experience data daily #socpharm
friedah03:
Gd idea! RT @jackbilson3: FTC says terms & conditions cn B confirmed w/ a check box 4 a home loan on the web; y not Fair Balance? #socpharm
jackbilson3:
@A0K @TheRealDanSfera #Google advertising algorithms just got a lot more cloudy! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@jackbilson3 Good analogy; presumably potential stroke or heart attack are scarier to regulators than a foreclosure! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
We need to discover new ways to experience fair balance information, such as using multimedia and interactive features #socpharm
A0K:
T3: why aren’t any pharma folks presenting @TEDMED? Why is innovation not embraced more visibly by pharma? http://bit.ly/9GFKuB #socpharm
friedah03:
@jackbilson3 Unfortunately, recent abuses in the financial industry make it hard to hold up as an example
#socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@AOK Because pharma is terrified of liability issues when making public presentations — same rules apply for conferences #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Pharma is also afraid of potential PR nightmares — if they say X they are quoted as Y, if they move Here they should move There #socpharm
A0K:
@SpitzStrategy yeah, but with the future of healthcare moving towards #meddevice & #biotech, there’s no time for fear #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Humorous: Imagine writing and designing a TED talk, and then sending the PowerPoint deck through regulatory! #socpharm
jackbilson3:
Agree big missed opportunity @a0k @SpitzStrategy future of healthcare moving towards #meddevice& #biotech #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
We all agree in principle — But when you walk the halls of pharma you realize that it all boils down to “regulatory approval” #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
That’s why this stuff has to originate OUTSIDE of pharma — pharma has the money, and can be connected with unrestricted grants #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
We can argue this (correct) point forever, but asking pharma to not “be pharma” begs the question and gets us nowhere #socpharm
A0K:
@spitzstrategy eh, I’ve “walked the halls of pharma” & still don’t feel that regulatory approval is all it is about. there’s more. #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Let’s think of creative ways to engage pharma money and benefit, but without exposing them to risk #socpharm
friedah03:
Funny! RT @SpitzStrategy: Humorous: Imagine writing & designing a TED talk, & then sending the PowerPoint deck through regulatory! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@aOK Sure there’s more — but it’s a slow and tedious process — we do it every day — and solutions must come for all directions #socpharm
friedah03:
Agreed RT @A0K: @SpitzStrategy yeah, but w/ the future of healthcare moving towards #meddevice& #biotech, thr’s no time 4 fear #socpharm
jackbilson3:
Thanks for the talk and moderation @a0k #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Some pharma companies are more progressive than others; a targeted approach is a sound approach, for patients and companies! #socpharm
friedah03:
We have to! RT @SpitzStrategy: Let’s think of creative ways to engage pharma money and benefit, but without exposing them to risk #socpharm
ellenhoenig:
RT @SpitzStrategy Humorous: Imagine writing and designing a TED talk, and then sending the PowerPoint deck through regulatory! #socpharm
friedah03:
Thanks all for another excellent #socpharm convo and @a0k as a terrific moderator!
SpitzStrategy:
For now, let’s see what the FDA/DDMAC writes up and tosses at us regarding guidance — allegedly by 12/10/2011 #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Indeed! Many thanks to @a0K (not @aOK
for a terrific tweetchat — proving that tweetchats can work, right @philbaumann? #socpharm
A0K:
@spitzstrategy @jackbilson3 @RichMeyer @friedah03 @MD_chat @therealdansfera @PhilBaumann@ellenhoenig Thanks for joining #socpharm!
philbaumann:
@SpitzStrategy They *can* work, but they need careful leadership. Not sure if they’ll scale, but so far so good. They must be fun. #socpharm
A0K:
@justonlyjohn good point > my answer http://bit.ly/acbUj7. you & other closet dorks who reply @ me need to start joining #socpharm chat. ha!
philbaumann:
@a0k My pleasure – good job! Cheers! #socpharm

