EileenOBrien:
Welcome to the marketing & social media pharma chat (#socpharm). Plse start w/intros & why u are interested in this topic.
stales:
@EileenOBrien 3x cancer survivor – interested in all things with pharma and social media – bringing the patient perspective! #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
I’m Eileen, work at Siren Interactive, relationship marketing for #rarediseases, & obsessed with all things interactive & social! #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@stales Love it! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Hello! I’m Michael Spitz, Senior Digital Strategist w/ Ignite Health, interested because “Mobile is the New Social” in importance #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
good evening; biopharma marketer boston; interested in evolution in biopharma marketing; patient-centric #SocPharm
CherylAnnBorne:
I am interested in #SocPharm both as a pharma eMarketer and as a caregiver to someone with a serious illness. EileenOBrien: @SpitzStrategy Just talking with @cherylannborne about her guest moderating #socpharm in 2 weeks & she will be asking all about mobile!
SpitzStrategy:
@stales: Great to have patient perspective represented! #socpharm
sneades:
RT @MaverickNY: Cephalon videos seek to bolster physician-patient dialogue http://t.co/oUH4wRx #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
RT @EileenOBrien: @SpitzStrategy Just talking with @cherylannborne about her guest moderating #socpharm in 2 weeks & she will be asking all about mobile! SpitzStrategy: @EileenObrien: Oh, I thought that was this week! FDA and apps? What’s our subject today? (sorry) #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@SpitzStrategy Yes, we are starting with the FDA & apps. #socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
Hi! I am Inessa Skorodinsky, CD for interactive advertising agency, obsessed with SM and DTC in pharma #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
T1: Should FDA have App Stores Under Surveillance? Do they have enough to worry about? http://t.co/mCWWrLC #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@EileenOBrien: That’s what I thought — apps to me mean #mhealth —
#socpharm
jilliantate:
Hi! I’m Jillian, with Integrated Media Solutions in L.A., and I work in digital direct response pharma #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
#SocPharm if the mobile app is a med device then FDA has no choice but to regulate. SpitzStrategy: iStethoscope hysteria was a bit over-hyped from the start: http://bit.ly/cKDdGC but regulatory issue still valid #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The question is where do you draw the line? Thousands of apps being created, the FDA doesn’t have the resources to regulate #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
I would think that there are priorities within apps — tiers as Cherylann aluded to #SocPharm
EileenOBrien:
T1: I’m not very savvy about what constitutes a “medical device” can someone educate me? #socpharm
sneades:
Hi Eileen! Never been to one of these. Lurking for now…#socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
@EileenOBrien FDA can’t keep up, no way they will have resources to keep apps under control #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Consider this recent article on the over-taxed FDA, and this is for official marketing content only:http://bit.ly/a0P3ek #socpharm
stales:
RT @EileenOBrien: T1: I’m not very savvy about what constitutes a “medical device” can someone educate me? #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@SpitzStrategy #SocPharm not all apps but those that are med devices or pharma-sponsored EileenOBrien: @sneades Welcome Laura! Feel free to chime in with your opinion. #socpharm
sneades:
I’m Laura Sneade, digital account director at Euro Life 4D, interested in opinions especially working with conservative companies #socpharm
jilliantate:
@EileenOBrien I think FDA should regulate apps that diagnose and recommend a product – but not apps that are “informational” only #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@stales Apps such as iStethoscope for the iPhone (featured today in the Telegraph) and Instant Heart Rate for Android #SocPharm
SpitzStrategy:
“Medical device” – tool that is officially recognized as such, intended for use in a diagnosis, affects structure of a body, etc. #socpharm
MarksPhone:
Hi Mark working 2 apply adult learning 2 physician education & patient communications 2 improve outcomes using problem centric mkt #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
“informational” apps can do as much — if not more — potential harm as branded pharma apps #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
Thanks! RT @SpitzStrategy: How the FDA defines a “medical device”: http://bit.ly/bppwO9#socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
RT @jilliantate: @EileenOBrien I think FDA should regulate apps that diagnose and recommend a product – but not apps that are “informational” only #socpharm
pharmaguy:
@EileenOBrien the prob w apps is sw can b designed to generate misleading data. There is precedent for that. #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
LOL RT @xrad2: @EileenOBrien Not really, but I know several medical ‘tools’ #socpharm
sneades:
FDA still figuring out OLA and SEM–apps a little too advanced or will they work backwards? #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
FDA double-standard is dangerous: The only difference between a branded medical device and an unbranded one is the designation #socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
@jilliantate I honestly don’t think there should be apps that diagnose or recommend treatments. #socpharm
MarksPhone:
Iapps and the FDA is one where we need to determine what are the expected outcomes of the app? Will it harm the consumer? #socpharm
foxepractice:
Does FDA regulate all software involved in diagnosis or data analysis? #socpharm
friedah03:
T1: I dont know how the FDA cn have the bandwidth 2 regulate apps 2 but I think I think they have 2 if 4 a medical purpose #socpharm #fdasm
SpitzStrategy:
What about a “branded” app that is branded in name only? One that merely performs a function related to disease state diagnosis? #socpharm
foxepractice:
@agDesignNetwork Can’t stop the future
#socpharm
foxepractice:
@SpitzStrategy Nice meeting you yesterday! #socpharm
MarksPhone:
Are apps medical devices? If so the device section of the FDA has control I believe #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
FDA should regulate dosing calculator for a branded pharma product: But what about a generic? Equally dangerous! #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@stales The concern is that these new applications turn an iPhone or iPad into a medical device. #socpharm
A0K:
@SpitzStrategy #mhealth is grand. I think connecting #mobile with help is the natural next step for #socpharm but it’s gone unreg’d for ages
sneades:
what constitutes approval? who sets precedence? here’s a good one. outcomes may be the answer.http://bit.ly/dpSmuX #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Whether or not a diagnostic tool can harm a patient depends a great deal on how that tool is used #socpharm
MarksPhone:
@foxepractice FDA regulates devices that have code to monitor say glucose etc. #socpharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy Wouldn’t FDA/DDMAC then have to make sure that ISI was included & prominent when brands were mentioned? #socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
No, wouldn’t dare to, besides that post is taken by FDA. — @foxepractice: Can’t stop the future
#socpharm
friedah03:
RT @pharmaguy: @EileenOBrien the prob w apps is sw can b designed to generate misleading data. There is precedent for that. #socpharm
foxepractice:
What about all the 100s of diabetes apps, they do some calculations… how far should FDA reg. go? #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@SpitzStrategy #SocPharm no such thing as branded in name only. If used to Dx why s/b exception? jilliantate: Is anyone else getting the fail whale? Are the #bieber fans flooding Twitter beyond their usual 3% of server bandwidth? #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The app regulatory issue is analogous to the larger regulatory issue: What constitutes “branded” content, and who’s responsible? #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@jilliantate: Half my tweets are Whaling — big #bieber day for sure! #socpharm
MarksPhone:
@foxepractice I believe these devices are required to be standardized on a regular basis with a known control #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@jilliantate I’m having problems with Tweetdeck too! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@CherylAnnBorne: The problem is that it’s tough to tell the FUNCTIONAL difference between branded and unbranded diagnostic apps #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
An unbranded, unregulated diagnostic app can harm or even kill a patient as easily as a regulated, branded one #socpharm
A0K:
it’s vital for (mobile) innovation + #opensource to not get a bad rap w/ the #FDA via the med app regulation issue #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Same problem with healthcare #socialmedia in general: Whether or not pharma provides the platform, the conversations are happening #socpharm
friedah03:
Wow! That’s a lot of territory. RT @SpitzStrategy: How the FDA defines a “medical device”:http://bit.ly/bppwO9 #socpharm
foxepractice:
@MarksPhone Will there be any difference between FREE vs. PAID apps? Guess not, since ad revenue will tick in…? #socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
RT @richmeyer: FDA: We?re watching mobile apps http://t.co/BAgDqGk #socpharm #mobilehealth#fdasm
SpitzStrategy:
Pharma is automatically accountable for all content on its sites & apps; third party players are creating their own apps & sites #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@SpitzStrategy I think you’re talking about FDA DDMAC approval, not necessarily the FDA device division approval. #socpharm
jilliantate:
OMG, ads in apps would be a whole other subject for monitoring – what if branded ads showed up in a condition focused app? #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
Consumers need confidence of safe & effective like all products they use fr: apps, test kits 2 cars; developed w/ regs in mind #SocPharm
friedah03:
Me too. RT @EileenOBrien: @jilliantate I’m having problems with Tweetdeck too! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
But third party sites & apps are unregulated, and potentially contain erroneous or damaging data #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@EileenOBrien: I understand FDA DDMAC vs FDA device approval — but regulation is regulation, same rules apply #socpharm
foxepractice:
Sounds like a nightmare for small app developers when you consider all the diff. countries the App Store is in?diff rules #socpharm
stales:
RT @friedah03: Wow! That’s a lot of territory. RT @SpitzStrategy: How the FDA defines a “medical device”: http://bit.ly/bppwO9 #socpharm
jilliantate:
@agDesignNetwork I agree, should not be apps that diagnose/recommend treatment, but someone is going 2 make them & FDA needs 2 reg #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Significant changes are forthcoming from the FDA in 2011 — not only regarding Web, but clinical trials, etc. Hopefully apps, too? #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@jilliantate i think mobi ads in apps are a great way for pharma to go #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
T2: What does everyone think of @AZHelps? Good start http://bit.ly/cpRIpD or inefficient?http://bit.ly/beTvrC #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
“Apps” already exist online, in the form of embedded browser-based diagnostic tools — these have been ignored for years #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
Flat world, complex RT @foxepractice: Sounds like a nightmare for small app developers when you consider diff. countries #SocPharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@SpitzStrategy don’t get your hopes up
#socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@SpitzStrategy But if they are regulating different things wouldn’t that mean they apply different rules relative to their area? #socpharm
foxepractice:
“intended for use in the diagnosis of disease…or prevention of disease” ? how about lifestyle changing apps? Prob. stops there #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@AZHelps is primitive and not an optimal experience, but a step in the right direction #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
T2: On one hand, do applaud any use of Twitter esp around brands on other hand, we have a long way to go! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@AZHelps could probably improve their response times, but every tweet must be screened in this environment #socpharm
agDesignNetwork:
@jilliantate Totally agree, but FDA will not be able to handle it. #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Agree with @EileenOBrien: Baby steps are sometimes leaps through pharma regulatory — if you’ve ever walked those halls, you know! #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
The problem isn’t a paucity of good ideas in healthcare #socialmedia marketing — it’s simply getting things through regulatory #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
It seems hands are tied when comes to #socpharm AZ is trying, but canned responses feel inauthentic SpitzStrategy: You not only have to convince the eMarketing managers, you need to sell the ideas to the attorneys and clinical teams, too #socpharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy @AZHelps should have pre-written and pre-screened more tweets prior to launch so they had a wider range #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
How do you sell truly engaging social media ideas to people who don’t understand social media, but are terrified of the risk? #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
RT @jilliantate: @SpitzStrategy @AZHelps should have pre-written and pre-screened more tweets prior to launch so they had a wider range #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@jilliantate: True that! Part of our challenge is convincing pharma marketing departments they need to commit ample resources #socpharm
jilliantate:
@jimsandino (a Rx VP at IMS) and I thought it was a big step for @AZHelps to even acknowledge #Twitter existed #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@jilliantate: Since every tweet needs to be screened through regulatory, the burden mounts every step of the way for them #socpharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy I sense you have been through some difficult regulatory conversations
#socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@SpitzStrategy Educate, educate & educate some more. #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
Would be interesting to know # consumer inquiries get via twitter vs other channels; consumers initial contact preference #SocPharm
SpitzStrategy:
Social media is about encouraging & sustaining CONVERSATIONS — pharma doesn’t get that, they want to plug and play and walk away #socpharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy But it is sometimes just as easy to get eight or ten tweets approved as it is to get one #socpharm
foxepractice:
“Since every tweet needs to be screened through regulatory…” how close are we getting to 1984?
#socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@jilliantate @EileenOBrien: Yes! Education is challenging, and internal conversations demanding — so many layers, so many cooks! #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
LOL! RT @jilliantate: @jimsandino (a Rx VP at IMS) and I thought it was big step for @AZHelps to even acknowledge #Twitter existed #socpharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy #socialmedia also about listening though – I like that @AZhelps announces they are listening #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
Re pharma brand Twitter, Race w Insulin does it best, IMO #SocPharm
EileenOBrien:
@ChrisMLindgren That is an interesting question. #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
good point on governance RT @foxepractice: “Since every tweet needs to be screened through regulatory…” #SocPharm
SpitzStrategy:
Listening is good — but it’s hard to listen when nobody is really talking in your over-regulated, paranoid little space! #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
Kimball drives engages sustains conversation, Reg puts a few approved msgs in between #SocPharm
EileenOBrien:
@CherylAnnBorne Yes @ambremorley says that @racewithinsulin was “perfect storm” of spokesperson already engaged in SM #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
It’s easy to judge pharma’s shoddy, mediocre attempts at social media — but the whole internal culture needs re-educating #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Millennials are on the rise — once THEY inhabit the halls of pharma, making key decisions, we’ll see the change we expect & need #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@SpitzStrategy We’ve come a LONG way in 3 years — I used to be told in mtgs that they couldn’t look at my online listening data. #socpharm
jilliantate:
Also, are consumers starting to see #twitter as a customer service platform? #socpharm” target=”_blank”>http://bit.ly/8Zg7LA#socpharm
foxepractice:
@ChrisMLindgren If we look at certain consumer brands, inquiries via social media is now the majority #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
@SpitzStrategy pls expound #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
Good point. All internal stakeholders need education @SpitzStrategy #SocPharm
friedah03:
T2: What we often lose sight of in #socpharm is that any form of communication must first add value for the participants SpitzStrategy: @foxepractice: Yes, but consumer brands aren’t regulated like pharma brands — great care must be taken at every step #socpharm
ChrisMLindgren:
Bottom line – it’s convenient @foxepractice #SocPharm
jilliantate:
@SpitzStrategy It’s quiet in the regulated, narrow space pharma acknowledges exists; more talk in the outside world Rx ignores #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
Dell set standard RT @jilliantate: Are consumers starting to see #twitter as a customer service platform? http://bit.ly/8Zg7LA #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
@jilliantate Good point, I know that people interacting with @comcastcares see Twitter as customer service platform. #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
T3: New Google Instant feature: http://bit.ly/c4UBkk. What do you think? Potential impact on SEM #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
TRUE RT @friedah03: T2: What we often lose sight of in #socpharm is that any form of communication must first add value for the participants SpitzStrategy: Twitter as customer service platform, with best practices: http://bit.ly/bR2aOp #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Google “Instant” is one step forward, a googol steps back! http://bit.ly/aA8ma4 #socpharm
jilliantate:
I’m worried for long tail traffic… http://selnd.com/b7t5gx #socpharm
jilliantate:
I am also worried that it will affect patients ability to find the RIGHT information by giving wrong answers too soon! #socpharm
CherylAnnBorne:
#SocPharm T3 I like http://bit.ly/bGbSDz better than instant search
SpitzStrategy:
Google “Instant” will mean some changes for PPC and SEO — but it’s a baaaaaad user interface idea! #socpharm
friedah03:
Not rlly sure the micro-sharing platform of twttr is generally worth the angst of getting thru regulatory 4 the results or lack of #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
Search is moving toward visual, associative journeys through intuitively linked information — “Instant” is an exercise in syntax #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
RT @jilliantate: I’m worried for long tail traffic… http://selnd.com/b7t5gx #socpharm
friedah03:
A big concern for #raredisease search! RT @jilliantate: I’m worried for long tail traffic…http://selnd.com/b7t5gx #socpharm
MaverickNY:
@agDesignNetwork disagree, had good experience w/ Comcast fixing Internet problems remotely on Twitter on several occasions #socpharm
SpitzStrategy:
@EilleenOBrien: Long-tail RIP? Yes, very possible. Plus, Google can manipulate results in a much more narrow field #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
Thanks everyone for taking part in a great #socpharm tonight. As noted before, @cherylannborne will be guest moderator on Sept 22.
ChrisMLindgren:
@EileenOBrien Google “Instant” will make our brains think differently about search; and provide intuitutive consumer metrics #SocPharm
jilliantate:
I think Google Instant + our ADHD culture = people getting distracted by what they see, not what they came to search for #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
Then on last Wed of the quarter (Sept 29) we switch the #socpharm time to the morning: 8 am EST so that some of our EU tweeps can join SpitzStrategy: Thanks to @EileenOBrien for moderating today’s #socpharm tweet-up!
CherylAnnBorne:
RT @EileenOBrien: Thanks everyone a great #socpharm tonight. As noted before, @cherylannbornewill be guest moderator on Sept 22.
jilliantate:
@EileenOBrien Us left coasters are definitely going to miss the 29th – too early for the early birds here! #socpharm
jilliantate:
RT @SpitzStrategy: Thanks to @EileenOBrien for moderating today’s #socpharm tweet-up!
friedah03:
If only that ez! RT @SpitzStrategy: Millennials R on the rise — once THEY inhabit the halls of pharma,…we’ll C the change… #socpharm
cpmahoney:
RT @SpitzStrategy: The problem isn’t a paucity of good ideas in healthcare #socialmedia marketing — it’s simply getting things through regulatory #socpharm
EileenOBrien:
I hope not! RT @jilliantate: Google Instant+ADHD culture=pple getting distracted by what they see, not what they came to search 4 #socpharm
friedah03:
Awesome as usual @EileenOBrien & #socpharm tweeps!
friedah03:
@CherylAnnBorne I won’t be able to attend on the 22nd but will have a margarita for you in Mexico! #socpharm

